As most of you know I took the theme for today’s service as “eating
an apple with attitude”. Now whilst the
story we read from Genesis does not refer to an apple being the fruit from the
tree of the knowledge of good and evil certainly historically the apple has
often been associated with that fruit.
So what does it mean to “eat the apple with attitude” and
what kind of attitude might we have as we eat the
apple – the fruit from the
tree of the knowledge of good and evil.
Well, to let you know from the outset where this is going I believe
one of the truths within this story is that like Adam and Eve we all reach out
and taste the fruit, we eat the apple.
But, and this is the big but, we eat the apple with an
understanding that despite this error God continues to reach out to us in love.
So we eat the apple with an attitude both of rebellion and of humility.
So let’s explore this story and this theme a little more
deeply.
Whenever I teach this story at school to grade 7 kids the
question is asked of me, “but is it true sir,” by which the questioner is usually
asking whether I believe Adam and Eve were real people.
In response I usually ask the students to put up their hand if
they have a brother or sister. (You can
do this now too). Now what I want you to
do is to leave your hand in the air if you have ever blamed your brother or
sister for something you did wrong.
Whether or not Adam and Eve actually existed or not, which
is indeed a moot point, the story is true in each of us. We are very good at conveniently blaming
someone else and deflecting blame if something has gone wrong.
Just as they story is true at this point I believe the story
is true in the ambiguous question it poses about the knowledge of good and
evil, of morality.
So, let’s focus on the tree and its fruit for a moment.
The very presence of the tree and God’s instruction
concerning it are paradoxical.
Here is the riddle as I see it. Adam and Eve are told not to eat the
fruit. But to understand that
disobedience to God is wrong or evil Adam and Eve need to be able know the
difference between right and wrong.
How can they know disobeying God is wrong if they do not
know the disobedience is wrong or evil?
But if they already understand eating the fruit would be
wrong then isn’t logical to say they don’t need to eat the fruit?
What is often presented as quite a straightforward story, a
story we will to teach in Sunday School, I believe has some quite difficult and
confronting themes.
What kind of answer might we find to this riddle in the
story? If we paused and looked back into
Genesis 1 I think we can find an indicator in the first of the two stories
about the creation of man and woman.
In Genesis 1: 26 & 27
‘Let us make humankind in our image, according to our
likeness; and let them have dominion over the fish of the sea, and over the
birds of the air, and over the cattle, and over all the wild animals of the
earth, and over every creeping thing that creeps upon the earth.’
So God created humankind in his
image,
in the image of God he created
them;
male and female he created them.
The little passage helps unlock the riddle in chapter
3. Man and woman are made in God’s
image:
So here is another truth the scriptures teach us which
traditionally be describe as the doctrine of the imago dei. Unfortunately,
like most things in the truth Christians are no always in agreement about being
created in the image of God means but let me suggest a few things. Being made in God’s image means:
We are creative beings
We are made to be in
relationships
We are loved and have the
capacity to love others
We are given knowledge
And, here is the biggie, we know
something about good and evil
It would be my contention that Adam and Eve having being
made in God’s image already know the difference between good and evil.
So when serpent turns up, with his crafty words and
exaggerations, he is not speaking to people who have no idea about good and evil
but to people who have the capacity for doubt.
Whatever the serpent is the doubt he sews into the mind of
Eve and through her Adam also is a doubt in their created nature, they doubt
they are in God’s image and try to be like God: another paradox.
Going back to the idea of how truth is operating in this
story one of primary the questions the story raises for us is this: do we doubt
ourselves and do we doubt God? The
answer in the story is clear – we do.
And it is because we doubt we go seeking for knowledge, knowledge
of good and evil, knowledge about God, knowledge about ourselves and knowledge
about our world.
Now on a day we are celebrating the beginning of the university
year I do not want to be suggesting that seek knowledge is necessarily wrong; whether
it is of good and evil or of engineering, pharmacy, teaching business, law or
whatever else you may be studying. However, when the motivation for our seeking
is grounded in the denial of our created nature in preference for the existence
we would carve out for ourselves then there are some serious questions to be
raised and that is what I believe this story does.
Flipping forward into the New Testament for a moment the
story of the temptation of Jesus is closely linked to the story of the
garden. In it the temptation to define
our own existence rather than accept our existence as gift is played out again
in a different way.
In each scene that Jesus is tempted we hear a temptation
that each one of us is susceptible to.
Jesus is tempted to turn the stones to bread: to use his gifts simply
for his own needs and wants. Jesus is
tempted to put God to the test: to place his trust in things other than
God. Jesus is tempted to gain power: to
use his abilities for the sake of his own prestige.
Once again these temptations ring true of the story in the garden
we too can easily deny the purpose our gifts are given for. Instead stones to bread it might be using our
gifts for building our own wealth: big houses, cars, expensive gadgets and
holidays. There can be no doubt in our
search for knowledge humanity has put God to the test, the rise of new atheism and
its prophets echo Friedrich Nietzsche proclamation “God is dead” whilst many of
us will use our knowledge and gifts to gain power and prestige for ourselves.
The scriptures tell us who we are and challenge us on
that. We eat the apple with attitude, we
seek knowledge and our motivations are intentionally or otherwise about denying
our created existence in preference for the identity we can make for ourselves.
But the stories do not finish with our failures or with God’s
rejection of us for them.
Hear the good news of the Genesis story. Despite the prohibition God makes, despite
the indication anyone who eats the fruit will die Adam and Eve live. Yes they die, but not immediately, another
debate point for theologians through history and God’s response involves consequences
yes but also grace. God makes Adam and Eve
clothes and God sends them into the world.
This story of grace is then backed up by Jesus response to the
temptations. Where we fail Jesus resists
and through the gift of the Spirit our lives are joined to his
faithfulness. The promise of his resistance
of the temptations culminates in the resurrection of Jesus and the promise that
death indeed is not the final word, just as death was not immediate for Adam
and Eve God’s choice is always in favour of the creation.
The scriptures show us ourselves: we eat the apple with
attitude; we pursue knowledge to set ourselves over against God and for our own
selfish motivations but despite the confusion of our ways God continues to
reach out in love for us. God transform
and resurrects our mistakes and leads us into new life. God clothes us again in
Jesus resurrection and promises us new life.
No comments:
Post a Comment